Where were the Adults??
- Bronwyn Jane Hammond
- 1 day ago
- 4 min read
The Kingsgrove North Incident and the Questions We Should Be Asking.
There are moments in education that stop you in your tracks.
This is one of them.
A 13-year-old girl.
Five hours.
Allegedly subjected to repeated physical and psychological abuse by her peers-filmed, shared, prolonged (reported on Channel 9).
Let that sit for a second.
Five hours.
Not five minutes in a playground scuffle.
Not a quick incident between classes.
Five hours where a child was reportedly punched, dragged, humiliated, and made to feel like she might not survive the day.
And the question that keeps echoing is this:
Where were the adults?
This Isn’t Just Bullying. This Is a Duty of Care Failure
Schools in Australia operate under a non-negotiable duty of care. That means:
Students are supervised
Risks are actively managed
Harm is prevented wherever possible
So how does a situation allegedly unfold over hours-
across spaces like bathrooms, school grounds-
without interruption?
Because this is the part we need to say out loud:
👉 Children do not go “missing” for five hours in a functioning system.
Not without someone noticing.
Not without systems failing.
Not without gaps big enough for harm to grow inside.
The System Questions No One Wants to Answer
If what has been reported is accurate, then we need to ask:
How are movement and supervision tracked during the school day?
What monitoring exists for high-risk areas like bathrooms?
Were there prior reports about these students-and if so, what was done?
How many warning signs were minimised as “drama” or “friendship issues”?
Because according to reports, there were claims of prior concerns that weren’t acted on.
And that’s the pattern we keep seeing:
Not one big failure.
But a series of small dismissals that lead to catastrophic harm.
“We Had No Idea” Is Not Good Enough Anymore
We are in 2026.
We know:
Bullying is rarely a one-off event
It escalates when ignored
It thrives in unsupervised or under-supervised spaces
It is often filmed now-because humiliation has become currency
This incident wasn’t just physical violence.
It was performative cruelty-
designed to be seen, shared, and relived online.
And still-no interruption for hours?
That’s not just oversight.
That’s a system that isn’t functioning as it should.
The Language Problem (Again)
We call this “bullying.”
But let’s be clear:
When a child is:
physically assaulted
psychologically degraded
forced into humiliating acts
and fears for their life
That is not playground behaviour.
That is violence.
And the softer the language, the easier it is for systems to avoid accountability.
What This Means for Every Parent Sitting at Home
If you’re reading this as a parent, the fear is immediate:
👉 If it happened there, it could happen here.
Because this isn’t just about one school in Sydney.
This is about:
supervision systems across schools
staff capacity and resourcing
how seriously early reports are taken
and whether behaviour is dismissed until it escalates
The Hard Truth Education Needs to Face
We cannot keep saying:
“We didn’t know”
“It happened quickly”
“We’re investigating”
When the reports suggest it didn’t happen quickly.
It happened over time.
And time is exactly what should have allowed intervention.
So What Now?
Governments are now talking about faster responses-48-hour action windows on bullying complaints.
That’s important.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth:
👉 This wasn’t a paperwork problem.
👉 This was a presence problem.
Where were the systems that:
notice absence
track movement
intervene early
and act immediately
When I was at school you got text message or a phone call home if you truanted class (different time and resources-you didn’t wait for them to come back to school you checked in for safety)
Final Thought
We tell parents:
“Send your child to school. They’ll be safe.”
But safety isn’t a policy.
It’s a practice.
And when a child can allegedly endure five hours of harm within a school day, we need to stop asking:
“What happened?”
And start asking:
“How did every safeguard fail?”
Because let me be clear about something:
I know bullying exists in every school.
I know conflict happens.
I know kids make mistakes.
But this?
This is not “kids being kids.”
When bullying crosses into psychological cruelty, sustained harm, humiliation, and violence-
we don’t get to respond softly anymore.
There are no second chances in the same environment for behaviour like this.
You don’t return to that school
You don’t get a quiet suspension and a reset
You are removed, and you are required to receive intensive therapeutic intervention
And where thresholds are met-you face criminal consequences
Because if we keep minimising this level of harm, we are complicit in what comes next.
And what comes next is already happening.
Children-as young as 13-are taking their own lives after prolonged bullying.
So no, we don’t get to “fluff around” this.
Not when the stakes are this high.
Not when the cost is a child’s life.
This is where systems need to be firm.
This is where consequences need to be real.
This is where protection-not reputation-must come first.
Because every time we hesitate to act decisively,
we are gambling with a child’s safety.
And that is not a risk any system should be allowed to take.
*information gathered for this blog post has been gathered from interviews and news reports.


Comments